Criteria for the 2018 State Honorable Awards
Participatory Governance Category consists of 3 honorable mentions.
1. Open Governance
This award is to be given to a government agency who steers an innovation and motivates the public and stakeholders to involve in a development of government administration by keeping an open system to the public involvement at the informational and consulting level with a two-way communication. The access of the communication system is made available throughout the organization and the public while the management of the information and public opinion is properly and continuously maintained on the basis of accountability and transparency in order to put the innovation and mission of the organization in progress.
Evaluation Criteria
|
List of Indicators |
Score |
|
Dimension 1: Organizational Capability (10 points) |
|
|
1. Mechanism in the organization to accommodate the public participation and put it in practice: 1.1 Policies / directions / plans to indicate the importance of the public participation; 1.2 Responsibilities / human resources/ agencies with assignments to promote the public participation; 1.3 Processes of initiating the cultures / values to promote the establishment of the public participation. |
6 |
|
2. Empowerment of the people’s participation in the public administration |
4 |
|
Dimension 2: Open System (60 points) |
|
|
3. Effective information disclosure: 3.1 A variety of channels with an easy access to information; 3.2 Published information with accuracy, completeness, integration, relevance, and timeliness. |
20 |
|
4. Effective public hearings from the people and the stakeholders: 4.1 A system / method of managing the public hearings from the people and the stakeholders; 4.2 Emphasizing on the feedbacks from the people or the stakeholders on the basis of accountability and transparency. |
20 |
|
5. Development or application of the knowledge, innovation, or technology related to the information disclosure and public hearings |
10 |
|
6. Database or integration of information among the relevant government agencies |
10 |
|
Dimension 3: Achievement (30 points) |
|
|
7. Success from the open bureaucracy to the public participation |
20 |
|
8. Satisfaction with the open bureaucracy through the perception from the people or the stakeholders |
10 |
2. Effective Change
This award is to be given to a government
agency who promotes an open bureaucracy to the public and encourages the people
and stakeholders on the collaboration at the Involve Level and the Collaborate
Level, leading to an effective change or development with a high impact on the
local people’s life as well as to a success in the efficiency of public
administration and the quality of life among the local people.
Evaluation Criteria
|
List of indicators |
Score |
|
Dimension 1: Organizational Capability (15 points) |
|
|
1. Mechanism in the organization to accommodate the public participation and put it in practice: 1.1 Policies / directions / plans to indicate the importance of the public participation; 1.2 Responsibilities / human resources/ agencies with assignments to promote the public participation; 1.3 Processes of initiating the cultures / values to promote the establishment of the public participation. |
6 |
|
2. Empowerment of the people’s participation in the public administration |
4 |
|
3. Effective information disclosure and public hearings: 3.1 A wide variety of channels available with an access in a timely manner. 3.2 Relying on feedbacks from the relevant stakeholders for the improvement of the public performances and services. |
5 |
|
Dimension 2: Collaborative Action (50 points) |
|
|
4. Participatory work in projects/ implementations / operations as follows: 4.1 Sources / the condition of the problem; 4.2 Forms / procedures / methods of projects/ implementations/ operations in the field starting from initiating projects, developing a guidelines, and implementing solutions to problems / developments. 4.3 Roles of each involving sector in driving the projects /implementations / operations in the field. 4.4 Learning processes |
45 |
|
5. Development and application of knowledge, innovation, or technology in the implementation of projects. |
5 |
|
Dimension 3: Achievement (35 points) |
|
|
6. Findings, outcomes, or benefits from the achievement of the development: 6.1 Benefits or successes, problems or obstacles, and factors of the success in the operation; 6.2. Models on driving the public participation. |
25
|
|
|
|
|
7. Satisfaction among the people or stakeholders with their roles of the participation in the public administration. |
10 |
3. Engaged Citizen
The award is to be given to an individual or a group of individuals with leadership or those who act as key actors in the public work with important roles in creating changes or developments on a participatory basis between the government and other stakeholders leading to a success of the development.
Evaluation Criteria
|
Component |
score (100) |
|
1. Social Responsibility |
20 |
|
2. Leadership |
20 |
|
3. Key actors / mechanism to drive or put operations in the field in progress |
20 |
|
4. Empirical success of the development |
20 |
|
5. An individual or a group of people with empirical recognition |
20 |
